You can access all of our platforms from a single Saxo account.
The price of the future: what Meta and Tesla's earnings reveal
Equities 5 minutes to read
Key takeaways
Meta's advertising engine is funding its AI ambitions, but rising spending raises the bar for future returns.
Tesla's profits remain under pressure, as investors weigh today's car business against tomorrow's robots and autonomous driving.
The real question is not who spends more, but who can turn investment into lasting profits.
Some companies invest in the future. Others seem determined to build several futures at once.
Meta and Tesla delivered their third-quarter earnings on 21 October 2026, offering investors two fascinating examples of this ambition.
Meta, the company behind Facebook and Instagram, is using its profitable advertising business to finance an artificial intelligence empire. Tesla, best known for electric cars, increasingly wants to become a leader in autonomous driving, robotics and AI.
Both are spending heavily. But their financial foundations, and the evidence supporting their ambitions, look rather different.
Meta: the money machine meets the spending machine
Meta's advertising business remains remarkably strong.
Revenue jumped 26% to 64.6 billion USD, helped by more advertisements and higher prices. AI is already improving recommendations and helping advertisers reach potential customers more effectively.
That matters. Meta is not simply hoping AI will eventually generate revenue. Parts of its investment are already improving the business that pays the bills. But those bills are getting considerably larger.
Meta now expects capital expenditure, mainly spending on infrastructure such as data centres and chips, of 135 billion to 145 billion USD in 2026. Its quarterly free cash flow, the money remaining after investment spending, turned negative at 2.1 billion USD.
A large legal charge also distorted reported profits. Excluding a 9.9 billion USD settlement-related expense, operating profit reached approximately 22.9 billion USD, representing a healthy 35% margin.
Meanwhile, its new AI assistant, Muse, has attracted more than 10 million registered users. The challenge now is turning engagement into profitable revenue.
Meta's proposed new non-voting share class adds another consideration: the company could raise capital while preserving Mark Zuckerberg's control.
The investor lesson: a profitable core business can finance ambitious projects, but growing revenue does not automatically translate into growing cash for shareholders.
Tesla: the future looks exciting, the present less so
Tesla's numbers tell a different story.
Revenue remained broadly flat at 28 billion USD, while reported net profit dropped around 43% to 787 million USD. The company delivered approximately 487,000 vehicles, demonstrating resilient demand. Yet operating profit fell 56%, highlighting the pressure from investment costs and the challenges facing its automotive business.
There were encouraging signs. Gross margins improved and Tesla generated 1.5 billion USD in free cash flow, despite quarterly capital expenditure more than doubling to 4.7 billion USD.
Tesla also reduced its expected full-year investment spending from 25 billion to 20 billion USD. But the investment story increasingly extends beyond cars. Autonomous taxis, Optimus humanoid robots and AI software could eventually create new revenue streams with different economics from manufacturing vehicles.
Meanwhile, Elon Musk confirmed that Tesla and SpaceX are exploring a potential merger. That creates another strategic question: would combining the businesses unlock valuable opportunities or increase complexity?
The investor lesson: Tesla's valuation increasingly depends on businesses whose future profitability remains difficult to measure. Progress in technology matters, but commercial adoption matters more.
Different businesses, surprisingly similar risks
Meta faces the risk that AI infrastructure costs grow faster than the profits they generate. Advertising growth, operating margins and free cash flow are useful early warning signs.
Tesla faces weaker vehicle profitability, execution challenges in autonomous driving and uncertainty around future investment requirements. Investors can monitor vehicle margins, commercial robotaxi adoption and cash generation.
Both companies also face a familiar risk: expectations. Even excellent products can disappoint shareholders when valuations already assume exceptional future success.
Investor playbook: follow the money
- Separate today's profits from tomorrow's promises. Understand which businesses generate cash and which still consume it.
- Watch spending efficiency. Rising investment becomes more convincing when revenue, margins and cash flow improve.
- Consider expectations. Strong companies can still deliver disappointing returns when investors pay too much for future growth.
- Mind concentration. Several technology holdings may depend on the same assumptions about AI adoption and spending.
The future still needs to pay the bills
Meta and Tesla are pursuing different versions of the future, but their earnings reveal a common challenge.
Meta has a powerful advertising engine generating substantial profits while its AI ambitions consume increasingly large amounts of capital. Tesla has an established automotive business, but much of its investment appeal increasingly rests on technologies that have yet to demonstrate their full commercial potential.
Neither approach guarantees success or failure.
For investors, the distinction matters because innovation and shareholder returns are not always the same thing. The most important question is rarely whether a company's vision sounds exciting. Both certainly do. It is whether that vision eventually produces more cash than it costs to build. The future may capture imaginations. But only profits can reward investors.