Quarterly Outlook
Q3 Investor Outlook: Beyond American shores – why diversification is your strongest ally
Jacob Falkencrone
Global Head of Investment Strategy
Companies most exposed to the UK are getting crushed
Christopher Dembik
Head of Macro Analysis
Summary: The path towards a Brexit resolution remains strikingly unclear, but one thing is certain: firms with high exposure to the UK market are taking it on the chin.
Despite the Kafkaesque political situation in the United Kingdom, the risk of an outright no-deal Brexit is quite low. The extension of the Article 50 deadline, for instance, could provide more time for the British government to find another solution. It could be a new referendum, or even an amended Brexit plan by Parliament. In other words, it is way too early to panic. Brexit is a very irrational decision, but it is unlikely that UK citizens and politicians are ready to commit political hara-kiri (or that European Union leaders would allow it).
There will be agreement, it is only a matter of time.
Limited macro impact but striking market impact
Brexit's macro impact is quite easy to evaluate: lower growth (though still above potential growth), higher inflation due to a lower GBP exchange rate and a lower savings rate as the British had to tap into their savings to cope with the economic slowdown.
On the other hand, assessing the impact of Brexit on companies is trickier. We can try to do so by using data from CBOE Bats (which covers 57 indices across 15 countries, pan-European and Eurozone regions, and Brexit and sector indices) as a benchmark for economic attractiveness and investment.
In the chart below, the blue line represents the 50 companies less exposed in terms of revenue to the UK market (Bats Brexit Low 50) and the red line represents the 50 companies that derive the largest portions of their revenues from the UK (Bats Brexit High 50).
The result is quite striking: Brexit UK risk premium is extremely high.
Since January 1, 2016, the performance of companies dependent on the UK market is negative (-4%) while that of companies least dependent on the UK market is nearly 40%! This gap is likely to remain wide if the Brexit political mess continues, and it can easily be explained by higher uncertainty regarding the UK’s relationship with the EU, negative consumer trends and the decline in the expected future openness of the UK to trade and investment.
All of this is making companies highly dependent on the UK less attractive for most investors, but for risk takers, the discount on stocks linked to Brexit constitutes a strong incentive to come back to this market.
There will be agreement, it is only a matter of time.
Limited macro impact but striking market impact
Brexit's macro impact is quite easy to evaluate: lower growth (though still above potential growth), higher inflation due to a lower GBP exchange rate and a lower savings rate as the British had to tap into their savings to cope with the economic slowdown.
On the other hand, assessing the impact of Brexit on companies is trickier. We can try to do so by using data from CBOE Bats (which covers 57 indices across 15 countries, pan-European and Eurozone regions, and Brexit and sector indices) as a benchmark for economic attractiveness and investment.
In the chart below, the blue line represents the 50 companies less exposed in terms of revenue to the UK market (Bats Brexit Low 50) and the red line represents the 50 companies that derive the largest portions of their revenues from the UK (Bats Brexit High 50).
The result is quite striking: Brexit UK risk premium is extremely high.
Since January 1, 2016, the performance of companies dependent on the UK market is negative (-4%) while that of companies least dependent on the UK market is nearly 40%! This gap is likely to remain wide if the Brexit political mess continues, and it can easily be explained by higher uncertainty regarding the UK’s relationship with the EU, negative consumer trends and the decline in the expected future openness of the UK to trade and investment.
All of this is making companies highly dependent on the UK less attractive for most investors, but for risk takers, the discount on stocks linked to Brexit constitutes a strong incentive to come back to this market.
Latest Market Insights
Quarterly Outlook
-
-
Quarterly Outlook
Q3 Macro Outlook: Less chaos, and hopefully a bit more clarity
John J. Hardy
Global Head of Macro Strategy
After the chaos of Q2, the quarter ahead should get a bit more clarity on how Trump 2.0 is impacting... -
Quarterly Outlook
Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios
Charu Chanana
Chief Investment Strategist
-
Quarterly Outlook
Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty
Ole Hansen
Head of Commodity Strategy
-
Quarterly Outlook
Upending the global order at blinding speed
John J. Hardy
Global Head of Macro Strategy
We are witnessing a once-in-a-lifetime shredding of the global order. As the new order takes shape, ... -
Quarterly Outlook
Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever
Jacob Falkencrone
Global Head of Investment Strategy
-
Quarterly Outlook
Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?
John J. Hardy
Global Head of Macro Strategy
-
Quarterly Outlook
Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher
Charu Chanana
Chief Investment Strategist
-
Quarterly Outlook
China Outlook: The choice between retaliation or de-escalation
Charu Chanana
Chief Investment Strategist
-
Quarterly Outlook
Commodity Outlook: A bumpy road ahead calls for diversification
Ole Hansen
Head of Commodity Strategy
Disclaimer