Head of Equity Strategy, Saxo Bank Group
Last month’s Equity Monthly focused on China setting up the premise of its own centrality to world affairs. But while China is destined to become the world’s largest economy, the country is currently experiencing a slowdown due the US-imposed tariffs and a general weakening of the massive, post-2015 impulse that has swept the Chinese economy forward for more than two years.
Among the latest fragments of evidence for a weaker China was the worse-than-expected Q2 technology earnings season, which saw many of the country's tech giants expand heavily into new businesses to secure top line growth at the expense of profit margins. Today, Chinese carmakers tumbled around 5% as Great Wall Motor announced an aggressive pricing campaign to maintain market share as the Chinese auto market has retreated to its slowest rate of expansion since early 2012. Growth has barely been above zero over the past 12 months and competition is increasing. This will likely hurt operating margins, and it could be the story that clings to Chinese equities over the coming quarters.
The current regime is a puzzling one. The Federal Reserve’s policy normalisation and Trump’s trade war is a benefit, at least in financial markets, to US equities at the expense of everyone else (see the trade war ETF basket chart below). Looking at economic forecasts for the G10 countries, only the US' has been raised while all others have headed lower. Our view is that US outperformance can continue for a bit longer, but a major swing is getting closer.
For the first time since 2008 we are experiencing a decoupling between developed and emerging market countries and equities. The two blocs have moved in tandem over the past decade with EM showing more downside volatility, but the direction has been synchronised. In 2018, the direction has inverted, as shown in the chart below. In our view, this is a sign that Fed’s monetary tightening is beginning to have an impact on the weakest link of the global economy: countries with structural current account deficits.
The Fed is confident enough to pursue an additional two interest rate hikes this year, but 2019 looks increasingly troublesome. On top of Fed normalisation, President Trump’s trade policy is strengthening the USD and adding further pressure on EM. Deep cracks have opened in countries such as Turkey, Argentina, South Africa, Brazil, and China. As a policy responsem China has added stimulus through the fiscal and monetary channels on top of recently announced automatic stabilisers (as seen in Europe). These moves will counter some of the effects and eventually change China's fortunes.
The bar is set so low that the slightest upside surprise on trade will likely push Chinese/EM equities higher by 5%
Stay defensive, keep technology
Our message on equity positioning remains as it was in August. We favour the two defensive sectors, health care and consumer staples, while continuing to also favour technology stocks (up 6.5% in August, measured in USD). Health care and consumer staples have low interest rate sensitivity and have a historical tendency to offer downside protection in cases of increased volatility. The technology sector has increasingly become more defensive because of very low interest rate sensitivity., but most importantly it still has the best upside potential in growth terms.
European equities are only interesting as a tactical bet when there is a positive change in the global economy due to their large exposure to materials and industrials.
Overweight equities versus bonds
With a global recession still at least 12 months out on the horizon based on the current available data, equities should still be overweighted versus bonds. Global equities are still not expensive in outright terms (see chart below) given earnings growth and global economic activity. The global bond market is still not offering an attractive alternative to equities as a yield component in any portfolio. Previously, bonds could offer both return and diversification during stressful periods; now, the yield component is gone but bonds should still be used to hence downside diversification.
Even US bonds remain unattractive for foreign investors as the interest rate differential is eaten up by currency hedging unless non-US investors want to assume the USD risk, but with the trade-weighted USD trading 13% above the historical average since 2006, it seems like a risky proposition.