Macro: Sandcastle economics
Invest wisely in Q3 2024: Discover SaxoStrats' insights on navigating a stable yet fragile global economy.
Chief Investment Strategist
US equities fell more than 2% yesterday driven by Nvidia shares down almost 10% as the DOJ sent a subpoena to Nvidia in an antitrust probe extending the case from previously just questions about Nvidia’s business dealings. The decline yesterday happened under more or less average volume potentially suggesting that the price pressure came from retail investors as we would likely have seen higher volume if institutional investors were also panicking about the antitrust probe. Nvidia said in an emailed statement to Bloomberg that it wins on merit and superior product value to customers. Nvidia shares are down 2% in pre-market trading.
When idiosyncratic events hit a company it is important that an investor thinks about the base rate of the event. In other words, can we use history to infer the likelihood of this event causing a dramatic impact on the business.
The big picture is that the number of antitrust cases since the late 1970s has declined steadily as the enforcement of antitrust changed from focus on market power, which was the dominant characteristic behind the Standard Oil antitrust case, to that of consumer welfare protection. It was not seen as bad to have market power if it did not cause harm to consumers with Amazon and Walmart being cases of this new view that took hold after the late 1970s. Since then all statistics show that industry concentration, the amount of market share concentrated among a few companies, has gone up and up.
As long as antitrust laws focus on consumer welfare benefits and not market power government prosecutors know that cases are difficult to win outright. Therefore the recent strategy has involved an aggressive litigation strategy that sometimes can force companies to settle and change a little bit. But recent evidence from antitrust cases against big US technology companies shows that antitrust probes have little impact on the long-term business. Antitrust cases also take years which means that by the end of the case the industry has already changed so much that it makes little difference.
It is important to understand that this probe is not going to fundamentally change Nvidia’s outlook in the short-term. Investors should not ignore this risk, but they should not panic either. There are other key risks to consider including growing competition over time (the technology industry is collaborating to loosen Nvidia’s grip on the market) and a recession.
Adding to the negative sentiment in semiconductor stocks including Nvidia was also the weak ISM Manufacturing report for August showing that new orders are now the weakest since early 2023 and on par with the 2012 period and the 2008 just before the credit crunch started after the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy. These figures raise the recession probability for at least the capital goods part of the economy. Why does that matter for Nvidia? Semiconductors are more sensitive to a recession than other industries because it is a capital intensive industry driven by long-term projects. In a recession companies will cut down on capital expenditure projects like semiconductors quickly and semiconductors are also used in every consumer device in the world so demand falls quickly in a recession. This scenario is likely also playing a role in Nvidia’s declining share price.
Previous weekly equity market updates
Disclaimer
The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website. This content is not intended to and does not change or expand on the execution-only service. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.
Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
- Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/en-gb/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)