MACRO 6 minutes to read

Data dive as trade war rages on

Eleanor Creagh

Australian markets strategist, Saxo Bank

Summary:  The China-US trade war extends well beyond trade as the 20th century's superpower and the would-be hegemon of the 21st jostle for supremacy across industries and sectors.


Trade tensions have continued to escalate and the US/China relationship has entered a more dangerous phase, keeping investors around the globe on tenterhooks with market sentiment continuing to gyrate as headlines and tweets unfold. Washington’s moves to blacklist China’s tech champions (Huawei and five Chinese surveillance firms) last week, halting their ability to buy US-made parts and components, has seen a new battleground confirmed. It is becoming apparent that trade is a mere sideshow to the unfolding fight for technological supremacy, increasing the probability that a tech "Cold War" has begun and a digital iron curtain could soon splinter the tech sector. 

China is currently a high middle-income economy according to World Bank classifications, but it hopes to transform into a high-income country via a focus on productivity growth. China has delineated its plans to become a world superpower within the next 30 years, with the aim of restoring China to a dominant position in the world order from its 19th century decline. These imperial ambitions and targets are demarcated in the industrial strategies laid out by China’s State Council, the first of which is “Made in China 2025”, which seeks to shift from export-led manufacturing to modernise the Chinese economy by boosting total factor productivity while maintaining innovation as a primary driver of economic growth, shifting up the value-chain in order to avoid the “middle-income trap”.

These ambitions span far and wide across industries where the US is typically the dominant innovator and controller of technological advances. China’s ultimate aim is not to be on a level playing field with the US, but to outpace the US and become the global leader in high-tech manufacturing, thus threatening the US’ hegemonic status.

The White House has granted US companies an extra 90 days before they must comply with the blacklisting of Huawei and other Chinese companies. This extended deadline, along with President Trump’s comments on Friday that Huawei may be part of a trade deal, has left investors with a slightly more optimistic outlook. There is speculation that pending a face-to-face discussion with Chinese president Xi Jinping at the G20 summit in Osaka (June 28), President Trump could delay this deadline once again. But with the trade negotiations stalling at this current impasse and likely to remain in limbo until the G20 summit a further escalation in tensions is not in the price. 

The situation could still get worse before it gets better. The US is currently preparing for a public hearing on another round of 25% tariffs and a June 1 deadline for China to raise the rate of additional tariffs to 25% on 2,493 US products is looming.    

Another question that continues to confound investors is whether Trump’s latest moves are part of a negotiation strategy or something more serious? Is a 5% fall in the president’s beloved equity market, which we know he views as a live barometer of his success, enough to exercise the Trump put? Or do the losses have to become larger before either side becomes motivated to reach some sort of agreement? At this stage it seems like the latter is more pertinent; looking at the trajectory of the rhetoric on both sides, a G20 deal would be miraculous.

As geopolitical tensions escalate, incoming data continue to raise concerns that any growth rebound remains fragile, and the rise in trade tensions risks stamping out any remaining green shoots. The uncertainty paralyses decision making for multinational companies, burdens capex intentions and forces supply chains to be unraveled in order to remove risk. 
Global macro data are painting a worrying picture. Last week, the US manufacturing PMI (purchasing managers index) was 50.6 in May, the lowest level since September 2009, according to IHS Markit. Perhaps most worrying was not the slowdown in business activity, but the slowdown in service sector business, indicating that what has been a manufacturing-led slowdown year-to-date may be spilling over to the services sector. 

“The slowdown has been led by manufacturing but shows increasing signs of spreading to services... trade wars remained at the top of the list of concerns among manufacturers, alongside signs of slower sales and weaker economic growth both at home and in key export markets,” said Markit chief business economist Chris Williamson.
Source: Wall Street Journal
China's weaker-than-expected April PMI prints also indicated that activity levels remain precarious – Beijing isn't out of the woods just yet. The latest April data released today showed China’s industrial profits posting their biggest drop since December 2015, another nail in the coffin for the ‘green shoots’ narrative. 

We await confirmation on Friday as manufacturing PMIs for May are released.

All this comes as the USD remains resilient, pressuring operating margins and profits for US firms and providing a headwind for corporate earnings. 
Disclaimer

Saxo Capital Markets (Australia) Pty Ltd prepares and distributes information/research produced within the Saxo Bank Group for informational purposes only. In addition to the disclaimer below, if any general advice is provided, such advice does not take into account your individual objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider the appropriateness of trading any financial instrument as trading can result in losses that exceed your initial investment. Please refer to our Analysis Disclaimer, and our Combined Financial Services Guide and Product Disclosure Statement. All legal documentation and disclaimers can be found at https://www.home.saxo/en-au/legal/.

The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service. Access and use of Saxo News & Research and any Saxo Bank Group website are subject to (i) the Terms of Use; (ii) the full Disclaimer; and (iii) the Risk Warning in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group.

Saxo News & Research is provided for informational purposes, does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. No Saxo Bank Group entity shall be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information on Saxo News & Research.

To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, such content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication.

Please read our disclaimers:
- Full Disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/en-au/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)
- Analysis Disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/en-au/legal/analysis-disclaimer/saxo-analysis-disclaimer)
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)