MACRO

Mueller and the market

John Hardy

Head of FX Strategy

Summary:  The Mueller report has landed, and its mixture of findings has only emboldened the fierce partisan divide in US politics. While markets remain broadly unfazed, the political battles to come could have meaningful effects on US policy into the 2020 election.


While the Mueller Report on Russian interference in the 2016 US election failed to establish that President Trump’s campaign “coordinated or conspired” with Moscow to sway the 2016 ballot, the multitude of lesser obstructions, infractions, and general murky dealings uncovered in the report mean that Trump’s domestic enemies are emboldened – even as his own base attempts a victory lap. For the moment, markets appear unmoved by the debate, but where the Democrats and the Trump administration take their battle from here could have a lot to say about US policy and even US stability into the 2020 election.

Here's what some key commentators are saying about the release.

Fivethirtyeight on the major Democratic and Republican blocs and how they are reacting to the Mueller report:

Democrats

One angle: The Mueller report provides plenty of meat on Trump’s obstruction of justice, but doesn’t feel empowered to bring charges against a sitting president due to extant Justice Department guidelines.

“Some analysts have cast the Mueller report as essentially an “impeachment referral” (read more at The Atlantic for for a heavily Democrat-leaning perspective on this).

The Dems' super-progressive wing (read: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib) is proceeding at full steam in trying to set formal impeachment proceedings in motion.

Among prominent Democratic presidential candidates, sitting US Senators Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris are explicitly for impeachment, but the fivethirtyeight writer believes that moderates’ 'no impeachment' approach will carry the day.

The middle road is subpoenaing for an unredacted edition of the Mueller report, in addition to having Mueller himself testify.

Republicans

On the Republican side, we see Trump loyalists eager to turn the tables and explore the origins of the Russia probe, i.e. “investigating the investigators”. Some would link GOP efforts to pursue this route to Democratic efforts to impeach.

If Republicans want to investigate the investigators, the Justice Department and the GOP-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee are the most logical places for an extended inquiry into the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation. And that means Barr and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham are, in some ways, the deciders here.”

The New York Times' Gail Collins offers the basic argument for the "don’t seek impeachment approach: 

“I am actually taking a conservative approach, which is that we can wait to reject this appalling worst-president-ever in the next election."

• "Impeachment would drive the whole country even further apart. The Republicans in the Senate would never go for it anyway.” 

“[The] report lays to rest the central and most damning charge against him, conspiracy (or collusion)."

The next steps for the Mueller report:

Democrats have subpoenaed the full, unredacted Mueller report and are awaiting the outcome.

 Ex-White House counsel Don McGahn, a prominent testifier in the Report who refused Trump’s effort to consider firing Mueller, has been subpoenaed to appear to testify before a House Judiciary Committee on May 21.

While the Mueller Report is the flagship of the Democrats' anti-Trump fleet, there remain several other angles for Democratic attacks on the Trump administration that we could see play out in the medium term. These include:

White House security clearances (especially for Jared Kushner)

The White House told former WH personnel security director Carl Kline to not show up for questioning before the House Oversight Committee. Kline’s lawyer said his client will listen to White House instructions. 

Past financial history/taxes

• The Trump Organization has filed a lawsuit against House Oversight Committee chairman Elijah Cummings and accounting firm Mazars USA LLP to bloc the chairman’s subpoena of eight years of President Trump’s financial statements, saying it “threatens to expose plaintiffs’ confidential information and lacks a legitimate legislative purpose”. 






Disclaimer

Saxo Capital Markets (Australia) Pty Ltd prepares and distributes information/research produced within the Saxo Bank Group for informational purposes only. In addition to the disclaimer below, if any general advice is provided, such advice does not take into account your individual objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider the appropriateness of trading any financial instrument as trading can result in losses that exceed your initial investment. Please refer to our Analysis Disclaimer, and our Combined Financial Services Guide and Product Disclosure Statement. All legal documentation and disclaimers can be found at https://www.home.saxo/en-au/legal/.

The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service. Access and use of Saxo News & Research and any Saxo Bank Group website are subject to (i) the Terms of Use; (ii) the full Disclaimer; and (iii) the Risk Warning in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group.

Saxo News & Research is provided for informational purposes, does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. No Saxo Bank Group entity shall be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information on Saxo News & Research.

To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, such content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication.

Please read our disclaimers:
- Full Disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/en-au/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)
- Analysis Disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/en-au/legal/analysis-disclaimer/saxo-analysis-disclaimer)
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)