Vote_M Vote_M Vote_M

The connection between US elections and market performance

US Election 2024
Picture of Peter Garnry
Peter Garnry

Head of Saxo Strats

As we warm up to the US election in November, we wanted to have a look at how presidential elections and equity markets hang together. Do markets affect the election, does the president affect the market, or are the two things completely unrelated? The answer lies somewhere in between.


For this article, we’ve looked at the 13 presidential elections since 1972. This period follows the break of the so-called Bretton Woods system in 1971, which meant unpegging the US dollar from gold, as this fundamentally changed market dynamics. Thirteen elections aren’t enough to establish statistical significance, so any conclusions should be taken with a grain of salt. Further, it is fair to question how much outlier years such as 1980, 1996, and 2008 de- or inflate results, which adds to the point of viewing these conclusions as suggestive at best. Over those 13 elections, 7 have been won by Republicans and 6 by Democrats. Five elections have been won by the incumbent president, 7 have meant a change of the party in power, while one election has seen a new president from the incumbent party in power.

US presidential election results

Does the election year impact market performance?

The first question we set out to answer was whether markets perform differently in election years compared to any other year. One could reasonably think the incumbent president would do his best to prop up the economy to look good.

On the surface, this hypothesis does indeed appear true, as the average return for the S&P 500 (not including the reinvestment of dividends) in election years yields 8.7% on average, compared to 7.7% in other years. But, as always, the devil is in the detail. Because due to the concepts of maths, it isn’t feasible to take the average return of election years and compare it with other years. To correct this, we stitch together these 13 years of return data and calculate the combined compounded return during these election years. The annualised return for election years then comes out at 7.8% annualised, which is very close to the compounded return during non-election years, meaning that there isn’t any significant difference.

SP 500 return 1year prior to election date in

Does the equity market impact election results?

The next question we could drum up was whether equity performance could say anything about who would win the election. After all, the equity market is one of the best barometers we have on economic sentiment and the outlook for the economy. It sums up the aggregate opinion about the future, and thus a rallying equity market into election day indicates an improving outlook, which in theory should be positive for the party controlling the White House. Here, we looked at the annual return of the S&P 500 in election years with and without a change of the guard.
New party in white house  SP 500 return 1year period prior to election date in

Based on the above graph, one could make the weak claim that a strong US equity market adds tailwind for the party controlling the White House. However, we cannot conclude that there is any causation between equity market performance and election winners.

Does the equity market favour a party in power?

The final thing we wanted to investigate was whether markets prefer a Republican or Democratic president. To do so, we looked at S&P 500 returns in the year following the election date.

US equity market favourite  SP 500 return 1year period post election
Interestingly, we observe significantly higher returns one year after the election if a Democratic president was elected. However, as for the general premise of this article, it is important not to view this in a vacuum, as these results are to a certain extent the result of outlier years such as 1976, 1996, and 2020.

In conclusion

Based on this analysis, the strongest conclusion is that we haven’t had enough elections since the break of Bretton Woods to conclude anything definitively. Although the data at hand shows that there isn’t any significant difference in stock market performance in election years compared to other years, there is a tendency for the incumbent party to stay in power in years with strong equity performance. Finally, the year after elections, markets have performed better with a Democratic president than with a Republican over this 13-year period, although it seems to be skewed by events unrelated to party politics.

Disclaimer

The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website. This content is not intended to and does not change or expand on the execution-only service. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.

Please read our disclaimers:
Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)
Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/legal/saxoselect-disclaimer/disclaimer)

Saxo Bank A/S (Headquarters)
Philip Heymans Alle 15
2900
Hellerup
Denmark

Contact Saxo

Select region

International
International

Trade responsibly
All trading carries risk. Read more. To help you understand the risks involved we have put together a series of Key Information Documents (KIDs) highlighting the risks and rewards related to each product. Read more

This website can be accessed worldwide however the information on the website is related to Saxo Bank A/S and is not specific to any entity of Saxo Bank Group. All clients will directly engage with Saxo Bank A/S and all client agreements will be entered into with Saxo Bank A/S and thus governed by Danish Law.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc, registered in the US and other countries and regions. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.